South Africa Gets Caught Up In The Partisan Divide

A few weeks ago, Trump caused a media furore when he tweeted that he was going to instruct his Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to look into “land and farm seizures” and “the large-scale killing of farmers” in South Africa, seemingly after he had watched a segment the previous night on Tucker Carlson Tonight about Expropriation Without Compensation in South Africa.

The tweet immediately ignited a fierce partisan debate. Political figures from all over the world and opposite ends of the ideological spectrum weighed in on the subject, their opinions predictably biased by their pre-existing view of Trump, whether negative or positive.

And, sadly, as a result, much of the nuance in the discourse around EWC was lost. There is a more complex discussion going on in South Africa,  but much of that is unknown to international commentators who probably knew very little about SA politics before Trump’s rash tweet. Scrambling to appear knowledgeable on the subject, opponents of Trump leapt to glib defences of EWC as a good policy designed to correct past injustices in SA (there is, in fact, robust opposition to EWC by South Africans of all races and political persuasions) and his supporters were quick to characterise South Africa as just another hellish foreign shithole.

This is nothing new. South Africa has often been used to serve certain political narratives. The far right in the USA have been pushing the myth of “white genocide” in South Africa for some time now in order to advance their own apocalyptic racial theories. Leftist journalists, from outside the country, have a tendency to seek out bizarre far-right fringe figures like Eugene Terreblance, creating the impression that such radical beliefs are somehow typical of the average South African (who is hardly ever featured). Nevermind the fact that Terreblance was an Afrikaner nationalist who led a bumbling paramilitary organisation in a tiny little rural town far from the centres of economic and political power in SA.

I’ll never forget the time that an intelligent British guy I knew from University insisted to me, despite my protestations, that I was probably “a weird South African” and not representative of the country after he watched a documentary on Terreblance, and came to the absurd conclusion that Terreblance was. There is great arrogance and ignorance in watching an hour-long film on a country you’ve never been to and thinking you know more than somehow who grew up there, but as the Dunning-Kruger experiments have shown, people with limited knowledge are not able to properly assess the limits of their expertise and sometimes lack the humility to question themselves.

This is the danger of “diagnosing from a distance”. It has become very easy in the Internet age with a plethora of information at our fingertips to think that we are more well informed than we are.

Many South Africans were also displeased by Trump’s intervention (and some were happy), but this included people who were au fait with local issues and had put forward their own arguments against EWC. These are reasonable people who don’t deny South Africa’s history and want to correct those historical wrongs, just not by undermining property rights.  The Eugene Terreblance view of South African history is certainly not mainstream.

Of course, I do not expect every single person in the world to have in depth and detailed knowledge of the political scene in South Africa, but it is really annoying when people oversimplify it according to their own ideological biases and political enmities, distorting the more complicated truth in the process.

Image Credit: Flickr

Candice Holdsworth

Candice Holdsworth is the founder and editor of Imagine Athena. It is mythologised that she sprang fully formed from its pages. Candice has an MSc in Political Philosophy from the London School of Economics, and thus can be most commonly found discussing ideas and culture. Her writing can also be found on Thought Leader and On Netflix Now. Follow her on Twitter @CandiceCarrie and Instagram @candicecholdsworth


  1. 1

    Since this documentary of hers is crowd-funded and since it will hardly bring her any fame, considering that the subject matter is given a very wide berth by the MSM (she also waited months before releasing it), I’m not convinced she did this just for self-gain and the fact that she did it does not reflect negatively on her (at all), notwithstanding some errors in it and some bad editing. She is getting the stories out, which is the important part, don’t you think? Or are these just ‘normal crimes’ happening at a normal per capita crime rate compared to other demographics?

    It’s not about her and the documentary does not give that impression either, so I think one should set aside the tendency to view everything through a personality politics lens, which is just a way of side stepping the real issues. Self-censorship is still censorship. This issue is not going to go away, even if people are now starting to outright deny that it is not happening. That’s just going to draw even more attention to it, no matter who is reporting on it.

    • 2
      • 3

        I watched the clip and I’m surprised that you did not pick up on how she was being facetious throughout. That seems to be her style for the most part, but she is clearly also able to tackle serious issues (as in the case of her South Africa documentary). Credit needs to be given where due and issues (whether frivolous & facetious on the one hand, or serious on the other) need to be distinguished from each other. Naturally when its facetious we should not take it seriously (and should even dismiss it), but when not – when it is not being facetious – we need to be able to recognise it as such and respond appropriately within that context.

  2. 4

    Here is the documentary by K.H. released a few days ago – she focuses on the personal stories of some of the surviving victims, especially in relation to the trauma that their children have experienced, most of them suffering from PTSD. If it were not for people like K.H. these stories would never be told, unfortunately:

  3. 5

    Hello Candice,

    I was wondering if your team still holds the point of view that K.H. is a “crackpot” as it was stated in you podcast about South Africa earlier this year. I watched her documentary on the situation with farmers and I was struck by her compassion. Compassion is a strong sign of sanity, no matter how eccentric a person is, whereas a lack of compassion, no matter how sane a person is, usually points to some imbalance (psychologically speaking). I’m sure you also noticed that C.R. made a statement at the U-N that all is well in S.A. None of what is being reported in any of these documentaries by “the crackpots” are happening, apparently. I remember that your team had quit a positive assessment of him after his inauguration, is that still the case?

    • 6

      I’ve never considered her a compassionate person. A few years ago she was saying that she didn’t allow her children to play with other children who had names she disliked. She also has a very weird thing against people with red hair. According to KH there “is nothing worse than a baby boy with red hair”.

Comments are closed.